Is it responsible to the NSA for the end of the story?Lantern go to Martin's day in Berlin Mitte has come the end of the story? And even the "national security agency" (NSA), the American secret service much discussed these days, blame for this? "The ubiquitous monitoring has created a world State: there is no place to which they emigrate can.", it was to read in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung this week. The author, Thomas master-Kuhlmann, his character a historical Professor at the University of Greifswald, between in his "This is totalitarianism" titled post about the all-encompassing surveillance made in United States and their consequences. This without mentioning the term, he tapped a topos, which in the 20th century happily between right and left intellectuals back and was brought here: the thesis by the end of the story. Is it responsible to the NSA for the end of the story? Francis Fukuyama had an important reference in the "neo-cons" - with his book "The end of history and the last man" since Updated discourse was been fired before much of the Russian French philosopher Alexandre Kojeve. Fukuyama 1992 claimed that the autocracy of the liberal capitalist world order had dawned with the end of the Soviet Union, garnished with some democracy, of course. "Mission accomplished", therefore already George W.
Bush Sr. can call. Kojeve, 60 years earlier, it was Stalin who had saddled up with its tangible variant of political Marxism and the implementation of the "world revolution" in a country as the Hegelian world spirit first. In both cases the historical dialectic should be reach - Kojeve this was still forecast at Fukuyama facts statement - so at the end of the story, the last dialectical synthesis. The universal world state of universal world State as a place to live without (System) contradictions and the end of history was proclaimed at least implicitly in both cases, but that's why it should not go here.
May 09, 2017
Posted by: |