Soon, through the economic and social reforms, of the distribution and proliferation of the technology, the production would be raised and would supply to all, without no exception. Later, the author affirms, without clarificar and explaining its affirmation, ' ' that both positions are defendable, each one according to its point of vista' ' (MOREIRA 1976 p.68), what we agree partially, in our interpretation each speech has its interest, its scienter, being the first one, for example, the speech of the elites of the countries central offices, reproduced in the peripheral countries (for the elites for the same interest and other segments for the common sense), that it would have the main objective to attribute to the poor population the swell of the great cities, the pressure on of the production of foods and the environment; as the speech, referring to the necessity to increase the production of the country, (and that through the increase of the production she would only solve the problem of the food lack), that also reflects an objective main, to take care of the Brazilian elites, mainly the agrarian elite that through the green revolution and of the modernization of the field intended a profit and production increase, and, complementarily wanted to prevent the agrarian reform. It is important to stand out that we only agree that each speech has its intention, and these cases to take care of to the desires of the dominant elites, exactly being about the different elites, and that we do not believe the viability of these proposals. Moreira, that already leaves gap opened in affirmation previous (the one that both positions are defendable), is left to lose for Malthusians ideas it affirms later, reproducing this ideology, that ' ' moreover, the raised demographic growth not only rees-echo in the current alimentary problem, as well as in the proper future survival of the humanity, through its implications in the balance ambient.. According to novelist, who has experience with these questions.
Posted by: |