What are the benefits of virtual tours and spherical panoramas over photo, video, computer 3D-models? Spherical pranoramy and virtual tours, on the basis of these panoramas have several advantages, chief among which is a visual, interactive, photorealistic. This combination of virtual spherical panoramas, among other visualization of interiors, architecture and landscapes. Spherical Panorama vs. photo photo does not provide interactivity, fails to fully immerse yourself in the picture. Plus, the virtual panorama allows one image to put the entire volume of the surrounding space, show interposition of objects, it is better to convey the future. Descriptiveness of virtual spherical panorama, thus significantly higher. Spherical Panorama vs. Videos in full screen mode is not comparable larger size, not allowing it to broadcast over Internet channels.
At comparable traffic makes the video only 'in the window' 320x240 pixels. In spherical panorama viewing angle, gaze direction, viewing time is not are clearly defined - unlike the video, you can examine arbitrarily and indefinitely. Virtual Tour based on spherical panoramas provides a non-linear view - perhaps in accordance with their wishes, jump from one place to another. This quality virtual tours especially valuable in online presentations, where there is an opportunity to show just what you need, not imposing, and without taking up extra time. Video, as well as photo does not have the interactivity. Spherical Panorama vs. 3D-models of computer 3D-models created in 3dmax, ArCon or through other programs do not have the architectural design photorealistic. Creating computer 3D-models take considerably more time and requires significantly more financial resources than individual spherical panorama or virtual tour.
Posted by: |